Capping Assessments In Georgia

| | Bookmark and Share
Here's an analysis by the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute on the impacts of a proposal to cap the growth in property assessment values.

The proposal (HR 162) restricts the growth of assessments to 3% or the rate of inflation, whichever is less.

The analysis makes two great points in particular:
Similar to a Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR), HR 162 places an arbitrary limitation on the growth rate. If the rate of inflation slips down to 1.6%, as it did in 2002, the assessment of Georgia property is tied to a national economic phenomenon (inflation) rather than the true value of homes in the local area. If legislators believe that property taxes should be capped, then there should be a thorough and detailed debate on what that percentage restriction should be. Is 3% the right level? Is 1.6% or other levels of recent inflation? Washington, DC caps at 12% while Arkansas caps at 5%. This fundamental change in the taxing structure deserves open debate on how and why to set the cap at a certain rate.
Secondly, the analysis offers a better targeted and more progressive way of providing property tax relief - enacting a circuit breaker:
Circuit Breakers provide tax relief by restricting property taxes to a certain amount of income. When taxes exceed that amount of income, the excess tax is refunded or credited through the income tax system. As of 2005, thirty-five states and the District of Columbia had some form of circuit-breaker program.
As we have noted many times already on this blog, capping rates of growth simply don't make for good tax policy.

Thank you for visiting Tax Justice Blog. CTJ and ITEP staff will soon retire this domain. But ITEP staff are still blogging! You can find the same level of insight and analysis and select Tax Justice Blog archives at our new blog,

Sign Up for Email Digest

CTJ Social Media

ITEP Social Media